The Greenwood-Williamson Theory is Reshaping Surface Science

The Greenwood-Williamson (GW) elastic contact theory offers a fresh perspective on how surfaces interact, with significant implications for fields ranging from materials science to engineering.

For years, it has been widely accepted that the real area of contact between two nominally flat metal surfaces was determined by the plastic deformation of their highest asperities. This led to the conclusion that the real contact area is directly proportional to the applied load and independent of the apparent contact area. 

However, the GW theory introduces a new perspective, demonstrating that contact deformation is more intricately linked to the surface topology.

Greenwood and Williamson's theory introduces a criterion for distinguishing between surfaces that come into contact elastically and those that do so plastically. They introduce the concept of “elastic contact hardness,” a composite quantity that depends on both the elastic properties and the topography of the surfaces. 

This quantity plays a similar role in elastic contact as conventional hardness does in plastic contact, adding a new layer of complexity to our understanding of surface interactions.

The theory explains that when two surfaces come together until a distance d separates their reference planes, contact will occur at any asperity whose height z was initially greater than d. 

The probability of making contact at any given asperity height can be described using the Gaussian distribution statistical method. The equations used to calculate the real contact area and total load take into account the number of asperities, the elastic moduli, the difference in asperity height, and the radius of curvature.

Experimental results confirm that the height distribution of deviations is Gaussian for many surfaces, allowing for the merger of equations to derive the total real contact area and load.

While the separation between surfaces depends on the nominal pressure, the number of micro contacts and the total area of contact depend solely on the load. This separation is not highly sensitive to pressure - typically ranging from one to two times the standard deviation, or roughly the centre line average.

This explains the average gap of approximately 20 nm between surfaces across a wide range of loads, highlighting the challenge in creating metal-to-metal gastight seals.

The introduction of “elastic hardness” allows for the prediction of contact areas based on load, analogous to the prediction of plastic contact using conventional hardness. The theory also introduces the “plasticity index,” a criterion for determining whether contact will be elastic or plastic. 

This index, which is the ratio of elastic hardness to real hardness, shows that the mode of deformation is not significantly affected by changes in load. Contrary to the common misconception that contact is elastic at low loads and becomes plastic as the load increases, the plasticity index provides a more accurate determinant.

This theory from Greenwood and Williamson not only challenges existing assumptions but also provides a more nuanced understanding of the mechanics of surface interactions, paving the way for advancements in material science and engineering.

Multi-sector expertise with Neale Consulting Engineers

Require mechanical engineering support for your product, project, or application? Then contact the Neale Consulting Engineers team today. We are happy to provide you with a free, no-obligation consultation on your requirements.

Contact Neale Consulting Engineers today